Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Monday, April 19, 2010
ITS NOT THE IPHONE 4G!!!
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Friday, March 19, 2010
Thursday, March 18, 2010
GoogleTV : Could Google make the set top box work?
That title is a little biased, its not like the STB has permeated american households already. Whether you are talking about consoles like the PS3 or the Xbox 360 or the STB used by every digital cable and satellite provider, the STB is pretty pervasive, or is that invasive? However, with the possible exception of Tivo and maybe WebTV, these Set top boxes have rarely ever fulfilled on their promise. If its the Ps3 or the Xbox 360, they are 95% games and 5% "other" so they can't really be seen as a success as a set top box.
Would a google powered STB be any different? I read that 24 hours of youtube video is uploaded every minute. Youtube is definetly something that has enough entertainment value to be justifiable in a STB. Now that everyone is conscerned with always being updated on twitter, Facebook, and yes Google Buzz I think now may be the time of the STB. When the WebTV came out, the most exciting thing on the internet was javascript, now we have online streaming video on Par with what you can get at blockbuster and ways to communicate that we didnt even see as viable 10 years ago. Skype, IM, Google wave, Whiteboards, Microblogging, there is enough entertainment on the web to justify a true set top box.
Lets consider the benefits that Google has going for it, if it were to make a set top box.
1.) Open Source: Any feature currently available on any DVR has been aped by open source and in a lot of ways, trumped. Using MythTV for example, you can automatically cleave commercials from your recording based on subtle cues like a complete black screen before and after commercials and the fact that the Channel bug ( the station logo on the bottom of the screen ) does not appear during commercials
2.) Google: Google has content through youtube and they can get you just about any other content using reader, news and of course search.
3.) Broadband: with 7mb or faster DSL becoming standard in many homes, I beleive that now is the time where IPTV could really take off.
What does Google have going against it?
Who would make a Google Powered TV box? I don't know if a redressed PC on top of your TV is enough for Google, they need to make a reference design that isn't just X86 with a different wrapper. Take a cue from Apple, who is now making their own CPUs or find a partner that isn't the perpetrator of the Beige Box blahs.
Either way, Google knows what they are doing, they understand their audience and they have the capital and the Brain trust to be able to bring it together into a true, set top box.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Exorcising Futility
I am a big supporter of reducing redundancy on the web. This is why I have strutch a strong lead towards Google services, why bother using webmail elsewhere when Gmail fullfills all of my wants and needs? ( when it comes to email ) Truth be told I have an account with just about everyone but Gmail is the only one I actually use. There is redundancy and then there is futility.
Example, Novell recently announced that they would be porting Microsoft's SIlverlight technology to the iPhone via the open source Moonlight project. Unless Novell knows something of which I do not, which is quite possible, the iPhone SDK forbids programs being able to execute instructions. This is why you do not see Flash, Emulators or even interpreters for the BASIC programming language, they have been made, Apple does not allow them. Why waste the time if you can't release it? To prove that it could be done? I don't think that was necessary.
On a similar note, Opera is porting Opera mini to the iPhone and from what I have heard, its speedy. This is great, this is dandy, but it is also against the terms of service. Whether it is because of the executable clause or if its just because Apple doesn't want competition for mobile Safari the iphone SDK does not allow this, again... unless Opera knows something I do not. ( I am quite sure they know quite more than me, but is this just a show of bravado or is there real merrit here? )
We need to exorcise futility out of our life, not excercising futility because we can, because worse than redudancy is the wasted effort and time that could have gone to a more charitable and open platform, like say.. Android.